[geocentrism] Re: Reality-check on science
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:24:38 +1100
Quoting Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: art@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:00:09 +1100
>
> Dear Neville Jones,
>
> You seem to imply that large telescopes are a waste of taxpayers money
> because they are useless. I apologize if I have misinterpreted you.
>
> No problem, I accept your apology.
>
> You should know that ...
>
> You should also know that ...
>
> You should also know ...
>
You skillfully gloss over all my comments. Anyway...
> ... If, on the other hand, we find that one of the founding assumptions of
> the theory, does not hold, then we will have to discard the theory all
> together, pending confirmation by other groups. And then it is back to the
> drawing board to try to come up with a theory that encompasses both the old
> and the new observations. That is science. ...
>
> Regards,
>
> Regner Trampedach
>
> This will apply to just about the entire field of astronomy if we can
> demonstrate that one of the founding assumptions of heliocentrism is wrong.
> Would you agree?Neville.
>
That's what I wrote.
But it also goes for your theory of a geocentric Universe.
I would like your confirmation of that.
Regards,
Regner Trampedach
>
>
> Get Free 5GB Email â?? Check out spam free email with many cool features!
>
> Visit http://www.inbox.com/email to find out more!
>
>
>
Other related posts:
