>go to "Proof of heliocentric incorrectness 2" (which will come up, rather confusingly, as proof number >3). >I have received two very positive responses to this so far (and one overtly negative, from I won't say >who). It wasn't me, in case anyone is wondering. I've read it, and have a view, but I'm a bit busy at the moment. It'll wait. This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.