[geocentrism] Pauls stuff.
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:30:32 +1000
Allen, I cannot accept the way Paul dispenses with your words by nitpicking
your grammar. He does it to me, but I ignore it. If he cannot read without
punctuation, then he would indeed have great trouble with ancient documents
having no spaces between words or punctuation. . Perhaps he was an English
teacher, still correcting essays.
I can always read through most of the stuff anybody writes, always forgiving of
the standards. After all we are not presenting a book for publication, but a
bunch of ideas for consideration.
However, at least give Paul credit for reading your stuff.
I stop after the first sentence or so which usually contains such glaring error
that I find the rest unworthy of my time. I say this as a brother, and not as
an adversary.
Truth takes few words to present. And fewer words to prove. If it takes more
than a few paragraphs, then the presenter is struggling to convince himself,
and will fail to convince another.
You have not yet in any way proved your assumption that WYSIWYG...AND YOU HAVE
IGNORED all evidence that is contrary to your view.
Did you put yourself on world A of my example?
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Allen Daves
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:40 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Question begging
Thank, you for your comments...Yes, I did get a little dyslexic there and at
times....I will take it you understand the last few posting since they were
quite small in length in spite of the poor writing and since you picked the
obvious errors up so readily....:)
Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Allen D
Please favour us with your proof/disproof of each of the statements below.
In doing so, please pay us the compliment of assuming that we are worthy of
your efforts to ensure that your response is readily comprehensible. This can
be achieved, at a minimum, by the following -
o allocating a new paragraph to each new thought;
o using proper sentences of modest duration and properly punctuated;
o taking a modicum of time to check your spelling;
o not using -
- "then" when you mean "than";
- using "a" before words which begin with a vowel (use "an" instead);
- repetitive use of hackneyed phrases derived from the practice of
logic;
- repetitive use of pseudo ellipsis in lieu of proper punctuation
etc.
======================================
2. Before proof of the GC cosmos can be viewed by folk of the HC/AC
persuasion they must first understand that the HC/AC view is not even a
logically plausible path to start to argue from or even pursue since by its
very "logical" constructs it is unprovable by virtue of the fact it attempts to
use what no one has in reality to ascertain what reality truly is.
2. Before proof of the HC cosmos can be viewed by folk of the GC persuasion
they must first understand that the GC view is not even a logically plausible
path to start to argue from or even pursue since by its very "logical"
constructs it is unprovable by virtue of the fact it attempts to use what no
one has in reality to ascertain what reality truly is.
======================================
Paul D
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.15/728 - Release Date: 20/03/2007
8:07 AM
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] Pauls stuff.
