[geocentrism] Re: Latest NASA wild goose chase

  • From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:50:13 -0700 (PDT)

PS.  Sometimes I wonder if Allen is an ET.    He types in strange coded 
languages and always talks about his Martian friend.  Just change the l to an I 
  Allen è Alien   J
   
    LOL 
  It took me a little bit to catch what you were saying.:)....Sorry i Keep 
spelling Martin as Martian i read and type so fast in what little spell check I 
do, I did not realize I was doing that.....As for Alien.. I thought i was 
blenidng in quite nicley thank you....but...."I come in peace"?..well 
kinda...more like "it is useless to resist us"....LOL
   
  PS....I'll keep your Health in my prayers....


Robert Bennett <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx> wrote:
        
             
  I am not so game to go with the assurance of Robert re extra terrestial life. 
   
  The NASA crusade to find liquid water in space, so as to infer that ET life 
was first, possible, then probable, then certain, is part of the MS modernist 
agenda to coronate evolution as our scientific idol ? the modern Baal. US 
public schools must only teach the approved religion of biology ? Darwinism. 
  So desperate are the modernists that they will probably find some microbes in 
space that were accidentally spread on the Moon and via space probes, and claim 
they have proof of ET life. 
  That was my point, Sir Philip. 
   
  I recall clearly the nuns telling all the kids, that man would find no life 
in space. except the devil.  
  Of course I laughed, and when Sputnik arrived, I cheered..  Nuns of course 
said it was the Devils work, and it being communist, I suppose they were close. 
 
   
  Yet I clearly remember a statement from the vatican of the time , which might 
have been modernist inspired of course, that if any life were to appear, it 
would be outside of revelation, and not of this world..  But this did not 
preclude Gods right to have created other life. There followed a short 
explanation of what such forms this creation would take, even unto intelligent 
life, whether it be angels or devils or sentient beings such as ourselves..  
Were such beings in existence, they had no place in the mission of Christs 
church, having no relation to the fallen progeny of Adam.  
   
  In essence they covered their behinds..  Which I thought clever.  so will I. 
   
  Off on one of your verbal riffs again??  Well, since you brought it up ?
   
  If ET life is discovered, the answer I was taught was that God never told us 
about ?them? , so they?re not part of the divine salvific plan. No conflict 
with the deposit of faith. 
   
  When asked if I believe in alien life visiting Earth, the answer depends on 
the def of ?alien?.
   
  There was Christ and the angels of Scripture, for sure. 
  And Enoch and Elias, who will return to die fighting the Antichrist.  But 
they were born here. 
   
  For any other ?humans? to visit us, they would have to be physically 
descended from Adam and saved by Christ. 
   
  I?m sure that the Auschurch has a different spin from the Amchurch on this.
   
  Robert B
   
   
  PS.  Sometimes I wonder if Allen is an ET.    He types in strange coded 
languages and always talks about his Martian friend.  Just change the l to an I 
  Allen è Alien   J
   
   
   
    Philip.  



Other related posts: