[geocentrism] Celestial Poles & Laws of Physics
- From: Mike <mboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:08:51 +0000
Hi all,
Hope you all had a good Christmas and New Year.
I haven't been receiving the geocentrism mails due to my paranoid
antispam measures - hopefully sorted now.
Neville, are you yet able to admit that your "Celestial Poles" diproof
of heliocentrism is incorrect?
http://www.midclyth.supanet.com/page32.htm
The circle traced by Polaris daily in the sky as viewed from a fixed
point on earth is due only to its angular offset from the celestial
axis, not its absolute distance from earth. The amount by which the
angular offset changes over the course of a year is miniscule due to the
huge distance to Polaris compared to the distance from Earth to the Sun.
This is basics trigonometry. Whatever your beliefs may be, in that
page you misrepresent conventional science by stating it says that the
"world axis constantly tilts such as to point directly towards the
(arbitrary, in this scenario) north celestial pole." Whatever your
opinion of me, or what I have written about you, you are still
misleading people by keeping that page up.
We didn't get very far discussing your "Laws of Physics" page previsouly.
http://www.midclyth.supanet.com/page40.htm
Perhaps we could start with the basics. What is it about your result
that you find "preposterous"?
Regards,
Mike.
Other related posts:
