[geocentrism] A geocentric proof.
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "geocentrism list" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:05:09 +1000
So far none has found reason to fault my contention and reasoning posted last
week, that the magnetic field does not rotate axially with the physical
material of the magnet. I admit the experiment has not been done, but I am
extremely confident that the simple experiment will prove it.
Consider the case where the magnet is a coil carrying a DC current. The field
through the empty axis of the coil is identical to that in a steel rod. The
electrons flowing in the coil are moving near light speed. Is it reasonable to
presume any rotation of the coil axially would make any noticeable difference
to the fields position, or cause it to rotate with the coil?
To do so would imply a different effect on the field strength were the coil
being rotated with the electrons or contra them. There is so much evidence to
the contrary.
On that premise, I will proced with the proof that the world does not spin or
rotate.
The world as a sphere represents a magnet having poles, and in all respects is
no different to a rod or DC coil magnet with an axial field. Whether the world
physically rotates or not, this field is stationary in space. Therefore if the
world physically rotates, conductors moving with it will react by having
magnetically induced voltages. The equator is the best place to demonstrate
this, due to the speed factor.
The difficulty of proof was the Faraday riddle interference with measuuring
leads, based upon a presumption that the field did rotate with the magnet. Our
proof that the field is static in space has removed this obstacle. I will, with
as simple as possible diagrams, demonstrate how. Keep in mind . The magnetic
field in all cases (diagrams below) is to be considered as not spinning,
stationary regardless of what the world is doing. Only an axial wobble would
make it move axially.
The basic principle on which our analysis is based. Fig.1
Next we replace a single wire with a single turn coil as shown , fig 2 In this
diagram the coil is not rotating.
Fig. 2
See the view from space above the coil.
Fig. 3.
Now we come back to earth and look at this coil from behind its alleged
direction of motion, the observer on the equator.
Fig.4.
Remember the sampling by the meter is taken only at this instant or position of
the rotating coil to avoid any sine wave variations, reading only the peak
voltage.
T refers to the north leg, and B refers to the south leg. Here T is moving
towards you at a speed equal to the worlds movement away from you, hence the
relative speed to the magnetic field is zero.
The shaft or M lead is travelling at equatorial velocity and generates a
voltage E plus at the top. Whereas B is moving at a speed equal to twice the
equatorial velocity, cutting the field at twice the speed. This gets twice the
voltage 2E. giving a net reading on the Meter of E.
Lets now see what the reading would be if indeed the world is NOT spinning. No
equatorial velocity.
Fig. 5.
From this diagram it can be seen that we have the standard AC motor action, a
static field and a static rotor that is rotating in the cross-field. The
voltages will be equal in T and B but opposite in polarity, because they are
cutting the field in opposite directions/ the meter lead has no motion and will
now be able to read a normal AC voltage if connected continuously.
Conclusion: Given that we may accept the field is not rotating but static in
space around the world, any vertical coil rotating at any known speed on the
equator or other latitudes, will generate a calculable verifiable AC sine wave
voltage. The reading would be quite different in both wave form and voltage if
the world was spinning.
My "graphic interface" with my brain is not all too good, so I'd appreciate it
if anyone finds a flaw.
Philip
Other related posts:
