[GeoStL] Re: Should he walk the plank? Please read this everybody.
- From: Michael Rogers <mrogers07@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 05:30:38 -0800 (PST)
While I appreciate that thought, I think the main issue is that there are so
many caches without a signature when surely said person could have found a
writing instrument to use. The general idea of caching is that finding the
cache
and signing the log equals a find. If you cannot sign or make your mark in some
way, you should find another way to prove you were there.
None of this seemingly happened in this instance, and that has brought about an
air of suspicion about all those finds. Surely in 140 caches, a working pen or
pencil could have been found?
-Michael
________________________________
From: Susan Ring <susanmring@xxxxxxx>
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, November 9, 2010 7:22:12 AM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Should he walk the plank? Please read this everybody.
All right now, I admit I have only read the original post and a couple of the
replies. BUT...I was at Mark Twain Lake this weekend.
I SAW his name on logs in several of the caches we found while we were up
there.
I remember thinking, oh look, so-and-so was here yesterday. Now I admit, I
don't quite understand the whole forgotten pen thing-maybe it was just a cut
and
paste log and he couldn't remember which ones he did sign.
Anyway, perhaps we shouldn't be too hasty in drawing conclusions. :-) And
perhaps an apology is in order?
Susan
Other related posts:
