[GeoStL] Re: Fw: SLAGA July Email Blast for ...
- From: "tnsl" <sydstyr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 23:53:28 -0500
I think I could certainly go along with that! Although, that whole payback idea
may just not work out how you would imagine.
Nancy
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack Anderson
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Fw: SLAGA July Email Blast for ...
I think that we should do this officer thing differently.
The people that win should get the right to appoint who will have to fill
that office position for the next year.
OH sweet payback time. ;-)
tnsl <sydstyr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nominating ended June 30th? and nominees have a month to decide if they
want to run or not?
Could we know which ones took a full month to make this decision? It could
be an indication of how things would run if that person is or is not elected.
heh heh
Nancy
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Bromley
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 10:09 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Fw: SLAGA July Email Blast for ...
Bridget,
We've asked all nominees to let us know of their intentions by July 30th.
The ballot should be sent out via email by the 15th of August. Since there
will be no voting at the fall picnic this year, the elections will close by
September 15th. At that point, the votes will be counted, verified and the
winners announced one week before the picnic. We'll conduct the business
meeting (my final duty) and introduce the new officers at that time.
Steve
On 07/05/2008 9:49:27 PM, Bridget E. Griffin (bridget.griffin@xxxxxxxx)
wrote:
> When will the ballot be released? Before the fall picnic?
>
> Bridget
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Jim Greene
> Sent: Fri 7/4/2008 7:11 PM
> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Fw: SLAGA July Email Blast for ...
>
> -
> We have great nominations for all positions, but there
> won't be any
> announcements until the ballot is released. Until everybody has been
> heard from, I know there won't
> be any preliminary announcements.
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:02 PM, tnsl <sydstyr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From the email blast ...
> >
> " So far, we've had several excellent candidates step up to run for
> > President this year. At this point, we still have nominations
outstanding
> > that haven't been accepted or declined. "
> >
> >
> > Is it illegal? unethical? or not allowed to know who has accepted
what
> > nominations/for what positions etc before we find out on a ballot?
If
> we
> > know what offices don't have nominations we may be able to take care
of
> > that.
> >
> > Nancy
> >
> >
>
>
> **
It's not only the destination, but the path you take and the friends you
make along the way.
Other related posts:
