> Well, that was a harsh and disrespectful response. I don't see where any of this has to do with the web site. It apparently has to do with whether someone wants help, or not. As we last left this, you misread the email blast, then made an assumption. I pointed out where your assumption was wrong by stated the facts. Look at my post below. I was trying to help you. Compare that to the tone of your response, how can you tell someone else they are harsh and disrespectful? I don't see where I can help you in this matter any further. You can have the last word - I'm done. End of Line ============================================= Paul said: ON August 12, 2007, SLAGA president sent an email blast to all the SLAGA members who have maintained valid email addresses in the SLAGA database. Andrew sent the following to the newsgroup on August 19,2007. It contains the same information that was sent in the email blast: Nancy replies: Yeah, well, on August 12 I was busy.. August 19 I was busier. I didn't care then. Now I do.