[GeoStL] Re: Cache Approvals
- From: "Tim & Pam" <timpam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 16:00:56 -0600
-
Sounds like we better get a good night sleep before attempting this one.
I guess that's a given though if RGS is placing the cache. LOL
Really Rich we do enjoy your caches keep up the good work!
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of GC-RGS
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 2:01 PM
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Cache Approvals
-
But who's going to be the first one to get a cache "not approved"? I'm
working on a virtual on private property on a set of railroad tracks with a
highway bridge above that needs to be climbed for the verification info.
Then we'll see if he's really our friend.:-)
****************************************************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com
Mail List Info.
http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
****************************************************************************
- References:
- [GeoStL] Re: Cache Approvals
- From: GC-RGS
Other related posts:
- » [GeoStL] Cache Approvals
- » [GeoStL] Re: Cache Approvals
- » [GeoStL] Re: Cache Approvals
- » [GeoStL] Re: Cache Approvals
- » [GeoStL] Re: Cache Approvals
- » [GeoStL] Re: Cache Approvals
- » [GeoStL] Re: Cache Approvals
- [GeoStL] Re: Cache Approvals
- From: GC-RGS