- Jim, Glenn has told me that unless the cache is marked as 'Needs Maintenance' or 'Needs Archived', he probably won't see it since he has his radar set on those attributes. I'd guess the Illinois Reviewer has the same type of filtering in place. If you have 1000's of caches to be responsible for, you need some way of being alerted that you have an issue. The cache you are mentioning isn't marked with any attribute that'd would bring it to the attention of the reviewer. If you are concerned, then put a 'Needs Maintenance' attribute on it so it raises a flag for the reviewer. I agree with Laurie and unless I've been out to see the cache myself, I wouldn't put the 'Needs Archived' attribute on it. Steve It's not only the destination but the path you take and the friends you make along the way On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Laurie Elfrank <lwatermann@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > - > Personally, I would never post a "Needs Archived" without visiting the > cache site myself. We took a road trip to the Davenport area last month, and > ran into multiple DNFs on about a third of the caches that we looked for. > They were mostly along a nice riverfront trail in Muscatine, so we didn't > mind the walk. We did post "Needs Archived" logs on every cache that we > didn't find that had multiple DNFs going back for several months. In most > cases, the areas had been under construction or in a flood area, and we were > pretty sure they had gone missing. In any event, we did the legwork to try > to see for ourselves if the caches might be missing. The last time I looked, > none of the caches had been archived. > > > > -Laurie (Denmother) > > > From: junkmailno@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [GeoStL] Abandoned Caches > > Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:54:19 -0600 > > > > - > > What is the best or proper way to deal with abandoned caches that have > > problems or appear to be gone? Many times when you are looking at caches > in > > an area you will find a cache that appears to be gone and has been > abandoned > > by the owner. Here is a good example: GC1Q03C The last 3 logs were DNFs > > and the 4th one (Nov 11) was a needs maintenance. They all indicate the > > cache appears to have washed away. The cache owner has not been on the > site > > since June and only found 19 caches. Clearly this one needs to be > archived. > > This one is in IL and the reviewers are not on problem caches as much as > the > > MO reviewers. Should one post a should be archived log without actually > > going there to check? Or do something else? There are getting to be more > > and more caches like this. > > > > > > Jim Bensman > > "Nature Bats Last" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > **************************************** > > For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes to your account, including > unsubscribing from this > > list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching > > > > Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw > > Missouri Geocaching land policies --> http://tinyurl.com/lgyy84 > > Missouri Geocachers Forums -->http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. > http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/ > > > **************************************** > For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes to your account, including > unsubscribing from this > list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching > > Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw > Missouri Geocaching land policies --> http://tinyurl.com/lgyy84 > Missouri Geocachers Forums -->http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php > > **************************************** For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes to your account, including unsubscribing from this list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw Missouri Geocaching land policies --> http://tinyurl.com/lgyy84 Missouri Geocachers Forums -->http://mogeo.ipbhost.com/index.php