[GeoStL] Re: ARTICLE
- From: "Barramus" <barramus@xxxxxxx>
- To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 20:09:29 -0600
46 KBS, lucky you.
I'm at 26.4 KBS.
Actually I have outlook Express set to NOTdownload anything larger than 150KB.
This week is the 1st time I ever got burned, my 10 MB email box filled up from
these 3 emails.
So I must agree, please, no large attachments.
A link to the article would be great.
Or we could even have it uploaded to geostl.com to download from there.
Thanks
Barramus
N 38° 25.081'
W 90° 42.823'
----- Original Message -----
From: John Kinder
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 7:34 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: ARTICLE
Please have mercy on us folks who use dialup and don't have DSL/cable
modem/Satellite/T1/etc.
This is the 3rd time this same 2.36 MB file, which takes 11 minutes to
download @ 46K each time its sent out!
Thank you!
----- Original Message -----
From: Tim & Pam
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 6:45 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: ARTICLE
Hopefully this will open for you.
-----Original Message-----
From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Geocachette@xxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 3:52 PM
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoStL] ARTICLE
Hello ... I missed the link for that article ... can someone please post
it again?
geocachette
In a message dated 12/2/02 4:32:34 PM Pacific Standard Time, writes:
Cool, nice article.
glenn
At 09:52 AM 12/2/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>While traveling thru Ill on a geocache/football weekend ran across the
>attached article in a Holiday Inn Navigator Magazine. The word is
really
>getting out. I only hope it doesn't get to the point that we can't
find
>the caches for the people.
>
>Princess & Frog
Other related posts:
