[fsf60k] Fwd: Nicaragua Network Hotline--December 15, 2009

  • From: michael cipoletti <ikecip@xxxxxxx>
  • To: FSF60K@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:34:07 -0500

interesting stuff...

Begin forwarded message:

> Topic 1: Sugar companies oppose bill to help sick sugar workers 
> 
> The National Committee of Sugar Producers (CNPA) attacked a bill presented to 
> the National Assembly to address high levels of Chronic Renal Insufficiency 
> (CRI) in the areas where sugar cane is grown in Nicaragua. The Committee said 
> that sugar growers and processors do not accept any relationship between the 
> sugar industry and CRI. 
> 
> The bill is the result of nine months work by the National Multi-Sector 
> Commission established by the National Assembly to address the problem. It 
> studied the preliminary results of a study by the National Autonomous 
> University of Nicaragua (UNAN-Leon) on the causes of CRI which showed that 
> agricultural activity, principally the growing of sugar cane but also of 
> bananas and peanuts, had a direct relationship to the kidney disease suffered 
> by the workers and by the population living near the plantations. 
> 
> "Based on this data," said Dr. Wilfredo Barreto, chair of the Commission, 
> "the executive committee began to put together two documents: a Protocol of 
> Understanding to include both government and the private sugar industry as 
> responsible parties that must provide an answer in the short term to the 
> demands of the affected workers; and a law that would provide a legal 
> instrument to resolve the matter in a more definitive fashion through the 
> promotion of good production practices in the agricultural sector." The law 
> if passed would regulate the use of agrochemicals, working conditions, 
> workplace safety and hygiene. It would also address the use of contractors 
> and sub-contractors who provide workers for the plantations and thus 
> supposedly provide a degree of separation between the owners and the workers 
> and limit legal responsibility. 
> 
> The CNPA, representing the sugar companies, reacted immediately with paid ads 
> in the principal daily newspapers attacking Lopez and saying that the 
> companies provided an "excellent health system to protect workers and their 
> families." The ads said the companies maintained "vigorous business 
> responsibility practices in which protection of the environment occupies a 
> fundamental place." The CNPA attacked "the sectors that want to discredit our 
> industry and that promote distorted information about kidney disease, 
> generating antagonisms that have only obstructed the search for an 
> explanation for and a solution to this public health problem." 
> 
> For nine months, a group of former sugar workers from the San Antonio Sugar 
> Mill, supported by the International Union of Food and Agricultural Workers 
> (UITA), has been attempting to engage officials of Nicaragua Sugar Estates in 
> dialogue about possible compensation for their condition with no progress. 
> Meanwhile over 3,500 workers out of an estimated 8,000 ill workers have died. 
> 
> For information about a boycott of Flor de Caña Rum organized by a group of 
> Nicaraguan young people, visit here. 

Other related posts: