Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V5 #115
- From: Rguercio@xxxxxxx
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:13:24 EST
In a message dated 3/31/05 9:50:29 AM Mountain Standard Time,
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Has anybody out there devised a way to implement variable setpoint
limiting on every PIDA block in the system? We're talking about it
here, but we don't see any way to do it without building a companion
CALC block for every PIDA block, which isn't going to happen.
Tim, I have always done this with one calc block per pida, tying SPHLIM and
SPLLIM to the appropriate real outputs. I start with the critical
controllers and do others as time permits.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V5 #115