Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V5 #115

  • From: Rguercio@xxxxxxx
  • To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:13:24 EST

 
In a message dated 3/31/05 9:50:29 AM Mountain Standard Time,  
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Has  anybody out there devised a way to implement variable setpoint
limiting on  every PIDA block in the system?  We're talking about it
here, but we  don't see any way to do it without building a companion
CALC block for  every PIDA block, which isn't going to happen.


Tim, I have always done this with one calc block per pida, tying SPHLIM and  
SPLLIM to the appropriate real outputs.  I start with the critical  
controllers and do others as time permits.


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts:

  • » Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V5 #115