Re: [foxboro] V90 with Virtual Operator workstations (Thin Clients) - too slow for emails + office chores
- From: Hizamri Johari <hizamri@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:27:52 +0800
Dear all
Our client, Petronas ventured into ThinClient for emails, office chores,
and x-terminals before..
It was too slow.. from login to actual usage was 15-30 minutes compared
to 5-10 minutes on a pc.. may be their ThinClient/Server/LAN/WAN were
slow.. it was discouraging that they changed to normal PC after 5 years..
The only success application for ThinClient here, are only as FoxView
Remote Desktop ( Windows I/A ) and x-terminals ( Unix I/A )..
Remote Desktop and x-terminal use less resources than Remote Virtual
Workstation..
I suppose if you have a very fast/huge in resources/reliable server and
network infrastructure.. Virtual Operator Workstation is acceptable..
God Knows Best..
Best Regards..
Hizamri
On 2/5/2014 2:10 AM, Dustin.Axley@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi,
> Just wondering if anyone has ventured down the path of using a V90 with
> Virtual Operator workstations (Thin Clients). Pros? Cons? Learnings?
>
> Regards,
>
> Dustin Axley
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] V90 with Virtual Operator workstations (Thin Clients) - too slow for emails + office chores - Hizamri Johari
