Use the latest document B0700BY-F for review when making your decision
________________________________________
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Stankiewicz, Anthony P. [X2STANKI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 9:19 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Online Image Updates
I agree with everything Tom states. I tried it a few years back on a running
system using the Warm Start option. It worked fine. I believe the manual states
that there could be, on a warm start, a few seconds of lost communications.
Tony S
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Badura, Tom
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 9:18 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Online Image Updates
Brian,
B0700BY_D - ZCP270 Online Image Update does a good job of defining the
procedure, process considerations, warm vs. cold restart for blocks, etc.
Although we are a batch operation and generally don't need to do online
updates, we did experiment with it and it went pretty much as advertised
(ZCP270s). As I recall, an online update with Fault Tolerant CPs allows you to
go live with the update on the first CP and then choose to proceed or revert
back before continuing with the second CP. I don't think the offline Image
Update has this option.
Tom Badura
Plastics Engineering Company
tbadura@xxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Brian Long
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 7:48 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] Online Image Updates
We are curious to know how many out in Foxboro Land do online CP image updates
and what can occur or issues it causes. What should be checked when complete?
What occurs to FDSI watchdog logic? Seq code? Logic/Calc blocks? PLB?
Thanks In Advance,
Brian Long
Arkansas Kraft
_________________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Schneider Electric
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own
risks. See the disclaimer at www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
_________________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Schneider Electric
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own
risks. See the disclaimer at www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________
*** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or attached
files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is
addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged.
If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from
your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person.
_________________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Schneider Electric
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own
risks. See the disclaimer at www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
