Re: [foxboro] Networking Issues

  • From: "Brown, Stanley" <stan.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "<foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 23:20:28 +0000

Wireshark and a good SNMP tool will help diagnose the degradation.

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 15, 2013, at 18:07, "Richard Peck" <lovetomix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thank you all, I will look at the trouble shooting hopefully today. I
> should have mentioned that the install is ~18months. We had comma drops a
> few times, then it ran for  almost 12 months. Then in the last week ~6
> failures. Hence why I've been more focused on a component failure. There
> have been no load or system changes
> On Sunday, September 15, 2013, cleddon wrote:
>
>> In the large number of Ethernet FDSI's I have worked on the switches have
>> never been the issue.   There is usually something wrong with the
>> configuration parameters in the FDSI Configuration file or the IA
>> programming (PAKINs can be sneaky if misaddressed).  You need to get wire
>> shark and a hub or a switch capable or port mirroring to view the Ethernet
>> packets to figure out what is happening between the fbm and the control
>> logix device.  I have not had difficulty with the newest FDSI and control
>> Logix but in the past I have found product problems on both the FDSI and
>> the slave devices this way.  Any good switch managed or not will do the
>> job, in fact the unmanaged will be less of a hassle in the event you get
>> some previously used switch that has some special  configuration already
>> installed.  We all remember switch stacking that came with the early
>> Enterasys mesh switches that made life difficult 5 or 6 years ago.
>>
>> Good luck, this may take a little while with the learning curve but it
>> will help a lot in the future with your Mesh troubleshooting as well.
>>
>> Chuck Leddon
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Sep 15, 2013, at 9:01 AM, "Brown, Stanley" <
>> stan.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you add a PC to the switch, and use it to run some connection
>> diagnostics with the PLC's and the FDSI? I would start with ping, but the
>> PLC's Suport SNMP, so there are lot of tools to get things like errors,
>> DROPED packets etc.
>>>
>>> In my opinion the availibity of these is one of the big reasons that I
>> am happy finally going to standard protocols.
>>>
>>> Also, you should be able to set up port forwarding, and use Wireshark to
>> really look at the traffic in. Detail, also.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On Sep 15, 2013, at 0:36, "Richard Peck" <lovetomix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> Thanks for the responses.
>>>>
>>>> The devices are two Allen Bradley PLC's talking ControlLogix over
>> ethernet.
>>>>
>>>> The TO option is for the device not the port - I've thought about
>> extending
>>>> that as my next step in trouble shooting.
>>>>
>>>> However because comms re-establishes after ~30 minutes there must be
>>>> another setting to manage re-connection attempts...
>>>>
>>>> Not sure what the network issue is.  Repeated connection and
>> disconnection
>>>> of the Cat5 cable also caused the fault.  Could also be a faulty switch.
>>>> We are upgrading all of the switches so this will be rolled out when
>>>> possible and may fix the problem if it is a networking issue.  Our
>> current
>>>> status is to disconnect all devices except the DCS and 2 PLC's - so far
>> no
>>>> loss of comms but the problem is intermittent so not really sure how
>>>> successful it is until a week or so passes.
>>>>
>>>> In B0700AH_L there is a section for "Ethernet Hubs and Switches" which
>> says
>>>> that the FDSI was designed and tested for option with devices listed in
>>>> B0700AZ which are all of the MESH switches.  It says FMB's may operate
>> with
>>>> similar off teh shelf equipment but Foxboro is not responsible...... {of
>>>> course the switches supplied were not these:)}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 15 September 2013 11:27, Joe Riccardi <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't think Foxboro qualifies non-Mesh switches; FBM/PLC. And I
>> remember
>>>>> a time setting in the driver XML configuration parameter; TO = X...
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 14, 2013, at 8:22 PM, Richard Peck <lovetomix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>> I'm experiencing some trouble with connections to a FBM232.  There is
>> a
>>>>>> network issue which causes the FBM to go offline.  Resetting the FBM
>>>>> works
>>>>>> 100% of the time.  Also waiting ~30m works.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I cannot find any options for adjusting this time period - has anyone
>> got
>>>>>> any experience with that?  I would imagine that it is a parameter we
>> can
>>>>>> adjust on the port configuration -> just not found yet....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However - in my digging I have found that Invensys actually have
>>>>> qualified
>>>>>> ethernet switches.  This is annoying as we have just purchased a
>> complete
>>>>>> set of Cisco Switches to replace a bunch of unmanaged hubs that were
>>>>>> originally installed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However - on a tangent - as my mind wondered - I thought this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Fox IA is the apple of DCS"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apple control all hardware and all software.  (dammit Foxboro certify
>>>>> some
>>>>>> standard switches like Cisco and Hirschmann)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apple take a long time to change from what they think is best, like
>> one
>>>>>> mouse button, and only Apply people like it... sounds Familiar with
>> our
>>>>>> DCS....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any ways, if you've experienced some similar network faults causing an
>>>>>> FBM232 to stop talking please let me know!
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>

________________________________

The information contained in this message and any attached files may be 
privileged and/or confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not 
the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of 
the information contained in or attached to this transmission is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please so notify 
the sender immediately without reading it. Also, please promptly destroy the 
original transmission and its attachments. Any views or opinions presented in 
this message or attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation or its subsidiaries.
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: