Re: [foxboro] IND sequence blocks and the BPCSTM parameter (Default = 100)
- From: Kevin Fitzgerrell <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:07:07 +0900
Agreed, that wait at the end of the loop is important! A few of these
continuously looping to 100 statements can really put a load on older CPs.
Cheers,
Kevin
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Douglas G. Lloyd <doug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> My experience has been that this is exactly what happens (i.e. the count up
> to BPCSTM and suspend part). To ensure that a consistent set of statements
> get executed each cycle, it's best to add a suspension before looping
> back...
>
> Regards,
> Doug
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On
> Behalf Of Riccardi, Joseph
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 8:41 AM
> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [foxboro] IND sequence blocks and the BPCSTM parameter (Default =
> 100)
>
> Folks,
> Just curious, if the IND block has no statements that suspend operation
> (i.e., WAIT, WAITUNTIL, outside calls, etc.) and it has less that 100
> statements and it loops back to the beginning (goto), will it continue
> to repeatedly run statements over and over until it reaches the BPCSTM
> quantity? Or in this case, when does it stop processing and move on to
> the next block?
>
> Thanks again.
>
>
> Joseph M. Riccardi
> Senior I&C Engineer
> Bechtel Parsons Blue Grass Team
> Richmond, KY
> 859-626-4368
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
