Re: [foxboro] IACC

  • From: "Wiggins, Bryan" <Bryan.Wiggins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:00:07 -0600

Troy this will not help much.  We were in the same boat in March. We =
know we were among the first installations.  We were told not to use =
IACC rather ICC. We were told to use ICC for the same 200 100 FBM issue =
although we are not using ATS.  We still have some issues but are =
waiting for a long shutdown before we try to sync our units to a common =
version of 8.3. Right now we are running 8.1.1 and 8.3 (limited version =
ha)

Bryan

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Brazell, Troy L Jr
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 9:50 AM
To: Foxboro User Group Foxboro User Group
Subject: [foxboro] IACC


Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset=3D"us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 =3D20

I hope someone can help with this problem. Foxboro has been no help at
all, usually they are very helpful, but in this case it's like they just
don't care and I have yet to talk to anyone who can speak English.

I have a new XP 2003 Server running 8.3 that I am staging for an upgrade
in two weeks. I am talking to a CP60 through an ATS setup mesh. I have a
mix of 100 and 200 series IO. IACC is version 2.3 with QF1009469
installed as per TAC. The control data base is being loaded from a
FoxCAE NT Save-all disk.

Issues:

Only the 200 series IO show up in Sys Management.

The FCMS all are there, but no ECB show up as children.

They do show up in Fox Select

=3D20

Second issue:

The block execution order comes in as crap. Requiring a good amount of
time to fix.

Once I have fixed the execution order, saved it, I proceed with the
verify and download.

IACC tells me that all blocks have been downloaded successfully, but
when I look at Fox Select I always find a number of missing blocks that
I have to delete from the CP one at a time and re-download. This cost a
good deal of time as well.

=3D20

Right now I think that IACC and XP to total crap for converting from
Solaris to XP!

=3D20

I can see where if you were doing a complete new system the IACC would
make building simple loops incredibly fast and easy, saving a huge
amount of time.

I hope that someone can help,

Troy =3D20

=3D20

=3D20

New Office Phone Number!

 **************************

Troy Brazell

DCP Midstream

ISA CCST

Sr. Process Control Analyst

Office 405-605-3877

Cell   405-301-2994

tlbrazell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

**************************

=3D20




-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: image/gif
-- File: image001.gif
-- Desc: image001.gif


=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe:      =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: