Re: [foxboro] AW: Systems backup

  • From: "Weiss, Andreas" <Andreas.Weiss@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 12:33:46 +0100

> This is often heard but not really true.=20
>...
> It only gets problematic if this process prevents other,=20
> "more important" processes from getting cycles when they need=20
> them.=20

I have had problems. Simple red SysMon alarms and messages.

... not only one alarm, a lot.


      07-03-05 07:09:56      0  SYSMON =3D SM1111  Q1111U  Station
        SYSMON -00043 Equipment failed

      07-03-05 07:10:02      0  SYSMON =3D SM1111  Q1111U  Station
        SYSMON -00041 Equipment on-line


Andreas
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: