Here's a scenario that I think should work. Nevertheless, I am interested to see if anyone else has tried it and knows for certain. I am considering changing the structure of some of our compounds by breaking them into smaller groupings. This would change their tag names in the historian. However, I want to associate historical data to the new tag names along with the new data. Given that data inside an AIM* historian database is accessed by means of an index number, not by a tag name, and given that the historian instance is created from a configuration file containing the linkage between the index number and tag name, if I edit the configuration file to associate all the new tag names, e.g. :NEWCMPD:TAG.PARAMETER as opposed to :OLDCMPD:TAG.PARAMETER, with the existing assigned index number and follow that up with the appropriate regeneration steps (histbatch [using the new configuration file], xrebuild and histsave) it seems to me that the result would be seamless access to all the data from a given instrument now associated with the :NEWCMPD:TAG.PARAMETER tag name. I hope that all makes sense. I would love to test this theory on a lab system, but that is one thing we didn't set up. So, before I try this experiment on our live historian, I just wanted to know if it made sense and if anyone else had successfully accomplished such a task. It's not likely I would change our database any time soon. But it is definitely a direction I would like to go. Thanks in advance for your input, Matt Gunter ATK Space Systems _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave