RE: Port 593 needed?

  • From: "Michael B. Smith" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:21:11 -0400

No. 593 is not required, nor recommended (some early versions of the
RPC/HTTPS whitepaper mentioned it, but it shouldn't be present in any
current documentation). 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mustafa Cicek [mailto:mbcicek@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 12:20 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] Port 593 needed?

I have the following network:

Internet >> NetscreenFirewall_1 >> ISA 2004 >> NetscreenFirewall_2 >>
Internal Network with one Front-End Exchange 2003 server+ one Back-End
Exchange 2003 server + one global catalog server.

I installed Exchange 2003 SP1 on both Exchnage servers and deployed
RPC-HTTP (Front-End/Back-End). On Front-End Exchange I installed RPC

You know, there is a registry value on RPC Proxy named ValidPorts. Must
the port 593 be defined in this registry value? If yes, for which server
(for BE? for GC? or for both of them?)

Best Regards

List Archives:
Exchange Newsletters:
Exchange FAQ:
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking: Leading
Network Software Directory:
No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: Windows Security
Resource Site: Network Security Library: Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions:
You are currently subscribed to this Discussion List as:
michael@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: