Here comes a (self-proclaimed) referee: Parallelism notwithstanding, this referee rules in favor of clarity. Wouldn't most of us prefer sentence A (as follows) rather than B? (A) I can post it if I choose to, but I can also choose not to post it. (B) I can either post it or I can not post it; the choice is mine. If we opt for clarity AND conciseness, we can simply say: I can either post it or not [post it]! Granted, this is more a question of style than grammar, but shouldn't we eliminate possible confusion wherever we can? We can, or we can not; your turn to choose! Shavuah tov -- whatever your preference is! Batya ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Reid" <reidnomad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Rivka Lewenstein" <rlewen@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: <etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, 27 November, 2010 8:15 PM Subject: [etni] the continuing saga of "can not" > Re: >> Sorry, David, but your first example (I can not post this if I so choose) >> sounds absolutely wrong to me. I would never use "can not" in that way. I >> would say, "I don't have to post this if I so choose." Anyone else care >> to >> chime in on that? >> >> All the best, >> Rivka >> > > Hi, Rivka and other readers, > > Three quick points concerning your reply. But first, I apologize in > advance > for capitalized words. They're supposed to be italicized words, not > shouting. This forum seems to eliminate most formatting, leaving few other > options for italics. (Suggestions, anyone?) > > (1) What Rivka is saying is that one CAN avoid the use of "can" altogether > by rephrasing the sentence. Granted. However, it is another matter > altogether whether one MUST rephrase it. If not, then we revert to the > original question concerning the cases when one DOES use "can" and a > negative. > > (2) It might help to give a broader context to the situation. Something > like: > "Harry, what are you doing with that paper?" > "Well, I can post it if I want. However, there's another choice. I can NOT > post it. It's my choice." (with a slight emphasis on "not".) (Parallelism > would suggest using "can not" rather than "don't have to.") > > (3) Yes, I can imagine that a person may have his/her personal style, and > would not use "can not" in this way. However, I have heard literate native > English speakers use it in this way. It is thus a matter more of personal > style than of grammar. > > David Reid > > > ----------------------------------------------- > ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org > ** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** > ** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** > ----------------------------------------------- > ----------------------------------------------- ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org ** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** ** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** -----------------------------------------------