From: "kochav" <kochav@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: rubrics for assessing the log I was also surprised to suddenly receive such a beautiful checklist that really would have helped me had I received it a year earlier (or through the online course I took 2 years ago...) So much for backwards planning of the ministry and for practicing what they preach!! I wrote to my inspector and she said we could use our own rubrics and checklists and not necessarily those in the handbook. I understand the rubrics are necessary only when the graded component was done orally so there's nothing else in the log to show for it. By the way- has anyone done the lit. program - log or exam with a 4 point class? We tried starting it this year in our 11th grade 4 point class. Teaching the lit. was lovely and kept the students in class, but when we started doing unseens for the C module we found their skills greatly lacking and scores way below average for similar classes who didn't spend most of their class time on literature. Does anyone have experience with a 4 point class and advice. Thanks in advance and good luck to all of us and our students tomorrow! Rachel Kochav Kobi wrote: > Did you guys see the new posts concerning the submission of LOGs this summer that were put up on the inspector's site? > I'm a little concerned about the checklist presented there and all the rubrics that we were supposed to check the logs with… (I wrote an e-mail to Judy Steiner about it and I'm waiting for a reply), but I was under the impression that using the handbook's rubrics is an option and not a must and according to this checklist they must be present in every log, in each unit and so on… > Am I the only one who misunderstood this? ************************************** ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org ** post to list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** David Lloyd: ETNI founder & manager http://david.greenlloyd.com ***************************************