**** ETNI on the web http://www.etni.org.il http://www.etni.org **** Ellen suggested I forward my reply to her to the list. See below. With humble apologies who thought my language too strong, though 'intolerant' is in itself rather a strong condemnation, Ellen. Are you all getting tireder and tireder of this debate as it drags on, though it was fun at first? As I concluded below in my reply to Ellen: "I guess we should put the discussion to sleep now. But surely there was nothing **funner** than a good debate such as this, eh?" Gary Calgary >From: "Ellen Hoffenberg-Serfaty JD" <serf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >To: "'Gary Zone'" <gary_zone@xxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: RE: comparative adjectives and geographical slurs >Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 18:10:56 +0200 > >Hi Gary, >I'd suggest you send this note to the list...especially the apology >part. There were indeed some who found your comments intolerant. > >Ellen > >-----Original Message----- >From: Gary Zone [mailto:gary_zone@xxxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 5:58 PM >To: serf@xxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: comparative adjectives and geographical slurs > > >Hi. >I agree that we should agree to disagree. That is, after all, the >democratic >way. >I agree that I should not have 'slurred' anyone's hometown. That was bad > >form and for that I apologize. >I spoke to some women yesterday at the University of Calgary that are >taking >a six-week TESOL course and put the same question to them and they all >agreed that 'tireder' sounded bad. They would not use it. They would >think >it 'slum'. >I have never heard words like 'tireder' on the air waves, neither on >Canadian, BBC or U.S. programs (except maybe in a situation comedy when >they >are trying to portray class, just as Ebonics are used in Afro-American >comedies). I really don't know where you have heard such a word used, >especially by fine orators. I don't think it plausible, but hey, I >wasn't >there when you were listening. >People may use whatever language they wish to convey their ideas. The >fact >that I may evaluate them by their language is no different than others >evaluating them by dress, body language, kemptness, etc. It is all part >of >the effect made on the receiver. Not only is the messanger evaluated, >but >also his/her message by all these extraneous behaviours and appearances. >I guess we should put the discussion to sleep now. But surely there was >nothing funner than a good debate such as this, eh? >Gary >Calgary > >_________________________________________________________________ >STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* >http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin >.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca > > _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/features&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca ##### To send a message to the ETNI list email: etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ##### ##### Send queries and questions to: ask@xxxxxxxx #####