Actually, by us it was the opposite. The Module D grades were relatively decent, considering that many of the students taking Module D were very, very, very weak 4-pointers, if they could even be termed 4-pointers at all. However, there were huge gaps for Module E, also by the 5-pointers. Again, my students were extremely weak, so I wasn't surprised that they didn't do well on Module E, but many of them had gaps of 30, 40 points. OK, I knew that there would be gaps, because their project (which they worked very hard on) really upped their magen grades, but I'm not used to *such* big gaps. One factor I must point out is that our students are Russian, and their writing skills tend to be stronger than Israelis' writing skills, which may explain why our experience was the opposite of yours. But still... There were large discrepancies in other modules as well, especially in Module A, believe it or not. That teacher is literally tearing her hair out. I am looking forward to seeing the actual test notebooks. As I've said before, it may be true that in the end, a 9-point question is only worth 3 points because students get an average of all 3 modules, but in the meantime, one or two questions have the power to create huge discrepancies between magen marks and the test marks, discrepancies which would not be there if there were only one test with questions worth 3 points each. I don't think that the Ministry is aware enough of the problem. All the best, Rivka