I was trying to setup this freertos + UDP project but even though I followed the instructions and fixed compilation errors I don't get any response, so I was planning to do a basic UDP stack too starting with dhcp. Your plan looks good to me, I would only add dhcp. > El 24/02/2014, a las 21:11, "Pekka Nikander" <pekka.nikander@xxxxxx> escribió: > > I've now started the work on a minimal UDP/IP stack for CoAP. Here are my > current plans; please make questions and comments. > > Basic principle: Be liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you > send. However, due to space limitations the plan is to drop (almost) all > optional features and support only the bare minimum. > > IP > == > No ability to generate packets on its own, only able to reply incoming > packets. > > - IPv4 only, header length always the default 20 bytes > - Type of Service: ignored when received, copied to a reply > - ID: ignored when received, copied to a reply > - Framentation: not supported; dropped if received, never sent. > - Options: not supported; dropped if received, never sent. > - Local address: Only one unicast address supported, no multicast support. > - Remote address: Copied to a reply. > > How about the following? > - TTL: ignored when received, copied to replies. > - checksum ignored when received, sent as such when replying > - simply swapping src and dst does not change the checksum, right? > - if we do anything more but copy to ID and/or TTL, we must implement > checksum updates... > - but updating the checksum is easier than verifying/computing it > - no gateway nor netmask, always send back to the sender ethernet address > > ICMP > ==== > Only supports ping (ICMP echo) as a compile-time option. ICMP errors never > sent, received errors silently ignored. > > ARP > === > - replies to ARP queries pertaining to its own IP address > - reply Ethernet destination address copied from the received packet > - does not cache ARP data, as only replies > - never sends ARP queries itself or keeps state > > UDP > === > Again, no ability to generate packets on its own, only able to reply incoming > packets. > > - packets received on non-bound ports silently ignored > - checksum ignored when received, always zero when sent > > Once this is up and running, we can consider adding more functionality, but > AFAIK this should be enough to allow the host to answer to CoAP packets. > > Comments? > > --Pekka > >