[elky] Re: Divorce and Contempt Action
- From: "Jim Dos" <jdos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <elky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:38:33 -0500
Sure hope it all works out in your favor..
~~~~++++++ to you
From: elky-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:elky-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Ray Buck
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 2:19 AM
To: elky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [elky] Re: Divorce and Contempt Action
This is an email that my lawyer sent to my soon-to-be ex. That little
"encouragement" of 30 daze in the slammer might encourage anyone to do what
the findings of law state in the decree of Separate Maintenance:
On 10/30/2012 4:47 PM, Mary Brown wrote:
Dear Gayle:
I know that this causes you distress. Can't we just get this over with?
The contempt action is scheduled for November 14, 2012 @ 9am before
Commissioner Casey. You should be aware that, if you will not sign the
papers, we will ask the court to hold you in contempt and ask the Court to
sentence you to jail for 30 days or until you are willing to sign Ray's
retirement documents as you agreed to in the Separate Maintenance action.
We have also filed for divorce. If you would sign an acceptance of service
and waiver for the divorce, we might not need your signature on the IHC
documents and could cancel the contempt action.
I know that Ray would still be willing to give you $500 if you will just go
ahead and sign the spousal waiver.
Please let me know your thoughts. I am reluctant to take these actions
because I know that your circumstances are difficult. However, Ray is in
serious financial distress and there is no reason for you to delay this any
further.
Best regards, Mary
I sure hope this does the trick. If it does, it could be the ticket to a
nice Christmas for a lotta people...even if I have to provide some
"encouragement" cash up front.
There might be a light at the end of the tunnel....and not a freight train.
Any crossed fingers, toes. +++++~~~~~ and/or prayers would be appreciated.
r
(Saddened that it comes to paying baksheesh to my ex to get her to do what
the courts already told her she was gonna have to do. At least I can hope
that the letter of the law will be sufficient to persuade her to do the
"next right thing, but at the same time encouraged that progress is being
made.)
Other related posts:
