Ian In both cases the narrator is on a mission to solve crimes involving relatives. Afterwards is a mother and daughter investigating a fire in out of body experiences and Sister is written from a very strange position but you don't know about that until just before the end. Steve From: ebooktalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ebooktalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Macrae Sent: 10 June 2013 18:25 To: ebooktalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ebooktalk] Re: Rosamund Lupton. Anyone care to outline what kind of fiction she writes? I must confess to be still struggling rather with Geraldine Brooks. Part of it is language. I don't believe any cook in the 17th century would ever have said, :I now the heft of every knife in this kitchen". It's a bit like those female American writers of historical fiction who think they create the language of the 15th century by inserting the word "Do" before every active verb. On 10 Jun 2013, at 17:54, Shell wrote: I think you might enjoy Sister David, though you do have to be on top of things at the end as Steve says. I think it's much more up your street though. Shell. -------------------------------------------------- From: "David Russell" <david.russell8@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 3:58 PM To: <ebooktalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [ebooktalk] Re: Rosamund Lupton. > I read "Afterwards" and really struggled with it for many reasons. It would > take a good deal of persuasion for me to try reading Lupton again. > > > David > > -----Original Message----- > From: ebooktalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ebooktalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Clare Gailans > Sent: 10 June 2013 12:03 > To: ebooktalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [ebooktalk] Re: Rosamund Lupton. > > Trish, I have Sister and will try it now as you say it is so much better. I > thought all the out-of-body business in Afterwrds spoilt what was otherwise > a good book. Clare > > > > >