Hi Steve,I remember very little of the plot of the Image Men now, but I found it funny at the time - early nineteen seventies - and I'm not very good at comedy. The characters were verry well drawn and the writing was good too which made it a good read.
there were too books as I recall - Out of town and London End. I'd like to try it again to see whether it still makes an impression, but there is so much else to read, of course.
It doesn't greatly bother me that Priestley didn't move with the times, after all, a good writer is a good writer.
Take care, Voldi At 12:15 25/05/2013, you wrote:
I recently read the whole of the Image Men, not sure if it was originally two books or three. The version I listened to was approx. 36 hours. I quite enjoyed it but it hasn't stayed with me. As separate books I think it would have been quite difficult as I can't remember that there were identifiable plots that would have made satisfactory individual books. I thought the main characters were good and the dialogue was well-done. Rather understated for the 1920s, I think it was set then, but it really didn't matter. Priestley is one of those authors whose career covered a long time but whose settings never really moved with the times. A bit like Agatha Christie in that respect although she wrote into the 1970s and she does mention modern inventions occasionally her dialogue and general feel never made it past WWII. The concept of the image men was rather ahead of its time and rather foreshadowed the way things have gone particularly at American universities. Steve -----Original Message----- From: ebooktalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ebooktalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Clare Gailans Sent: 17 May 2013 08:52 To: ebooktalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ebooktalk] Priestley June, I will try the Edwardians. I agree with Voldi about the Image Men. Read it nearly forty years ago, but I am discovering with a bit of recent re-reading that what I liked back then I generally still like now. He is one of very few writers who has often made me laugh out loud. I don't do much humour in books, but his is often about the choice of words, which is usually what works for me with book humour. I read the Festival at Farbridge more like twenty years ago, and that had some hilarious bits too, and similarly good characters. If you want to be frightened, read Benighted. Not funny at all. I still haven't read the Good Companions. Must put that right. I once heard him say he was sick of it, it was so popular in its day. Oh, another brilliant one is Lost Empires, all about the characters who work in variety theathre coming up to WW1. And Bright Day is very good too. Clare