Hello Steve: I think it would be better to have two user-definable rule files as it would keep the two processes separate. Trying to perform both braille-to-print and print-to-braille exception rules in one user-definable rule file, might not only be confusing for DBT but also for any user creating the exception rules. Sincerely: Dave Durber On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:34:08 -0500, you wrote: >Dave, > >I had a similar thought, but I called it an acronyms dictionary. I like >your idea of having a file for back-translations as well. Maybe one file >could be used for both forward and backward translation rules, but that's >something the developers can work out later. > >Steve > >On Wednesday 1/26/05 22:32 Dave Durber wrote: > >>With all due respect, it is not whether DBT is not smart enough to >>recognize the context rule for transcribing words such as flagstaff >>and flagstone, it is the fact that it has not been taught the context >>rules for those types of words and how they should be uncontracted >>when they are transcribed from braille rules to print rules. >> >>I dare say, those of us who are familiar with transcribing files from >>braille to print, could give many other examples where DBT performs >>incorrect transcriptions from braille to print. >> >>In my opinion, DBT is lacking an extremely useful feature, that is, >>two user-definable rule files. For example, if you wanted words such >>as flagstaff and flagstone to be correctly represented in print when >>you transcribed a file from braille to print, you would type those two >>words as they appear in a braille file followed by the way they are to >>appear in print. There should be another user-definable rule file >>that does the same thing but in reverse, where the word is typed as it >>appears in print then you type the word as it is to be shown in >>braille. >> >>The advantage in having a feature as described above, is that you can >>build many user-definable rule files for many types of situations. >>For example, if you transcribe files from print to braille or from >>braille to print for several individuals who are members of different >>professions, you can build rule files that contain the abbreviations >>for the various professions to which those individuals belong. Also, >>you will know that they will be transcribed correctly in whichever >>direction you are performing the transcription, providing you enter >>them correctly, of course! >> >>Sincerely: >> >>Dave Durber >> >>On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:18:50 -0800, you wrote: >> >> >Actually, it is back translating "agst" to against, as "agst" is the >> >short-form word for "against." >> > >> >The problem is context. Duxbury is not smart enough to realize that this >> >time "agst" is just "agst." >> > >> >If you know the short-form words, you will recognize that Duxbury makes this >> >type of back translation error frequently. >> > >> >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >Gaeir (rhymes with "fire") Dietrich >> >Alternate Media Training Specialist / Instructor >> >High Tech Center Training Unit >> >De Anza College, Cupertino, CA >> >408.996.6043 >> >www.htctu.net >> > >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: duxuser-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:duxuser-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >> >Behalf Of Ann Byrne >> >Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 3:13 PM >> >To: duxuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >Subject: [duxuser] flagainstone? >> > >> >I have used Duxbury since DOS, and it's an awesome program. One consistent >> >error it makes, however, in back translating from Braille to print is >> >interpreting the 'ag/' in 'flagstone' and 'Flagstaff' as 'against.' this is >> >totally non-serious for me, but I was a little surprised that even in >> >Version 1.05 it's there. >> > >> >It would be a nice fix sometime. >> > >> > >> > >> >* * * >> >* This message is via list duxuser at freelists.org. >> >* To unsubscribe, send a blank message with >> >* unsubscribe >> >* as the subject to <duxuser-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also >> >* subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription >> >* options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive >> >* is also located there. >> >* Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com >> >* * * >> > >> >* * * >> >* This message is via list duxuser at freelists.org. >> >* To unsubscribe, send a blank message with >> >* unsubscribe >> >* as the subject to <duxuser-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also >> >* subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription >> >* options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive >> >* is also located there. >> >* Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com >> >* * * >> >> >> >>-- >>No virus found in this outgoing message. >>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.5 - Release Date: 1/26/2005 >> >>* * * >>* This message is via list duxuser at freelists.org. >>* To unsubscribe, send a blank message with >>* unsubscribe >>* as the subject to <duxuser-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also >>* subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription >>* options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive >>* is also located there. >>* Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com >>* * * > > >* * * >* This message is via list duxuser at freelists.org. >* To unsubscribe, send a blank message with >* unsubscribe >* as the subject to <duxuser-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also >* subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription >* options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive >* is also located there. >* Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com >* * * -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.5 - Release Date: 1/26/2005 * * * * This message is via list duxuser at freelists.org. * To unsubscribe, send a blank message with * unsubscribe * as the subject to <duxuser-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also * subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription * options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive * is also located there. * Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com * * *