[ddots-l] Re: MOTU WDM Drivers Are Better Than There ASIO Ones

  • From: "Phil Muir" <ddots@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:08:35 -0000

Busy over on the MIDIMag list, and doing other things.

Regards, Phil Muir
P J Muir Productions
Music And Audio Production
URL:
www.philmuir.com/
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Christer" <m-christer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 8:01 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: MOTU WDM Drivers Are Better Than There ASIO Ones


> Hey Phil!
>
> "...by the way welcome back Phil..."
>
> Where have you been?
>
> Mike
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Luis Elorza" <luiselorza@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 6:54 PM
> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: MOTU WDM Drivers Are Better Than There ASIO Ones
>
>
>>i have found very convenient using wdm drivers because you don't need low 
>>latency all the time, i 
>>only use low latency when playing soft synths . when recording audio or 
>>mixing i usually turn the 
>>buffer size all the way to 100 percent and the cpu will handle a huge amount 
>>of plug ins and 
>>tracks. when i use asio i can't change the buffer size in sonar.
>> by the way welcome back Phil.
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Phil Muir" <ddots@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 12:34 AM
>> Subject: [ddots-l] MOTU WDM Drivers Are Better Than There ASIO Ones
>>
>>
>>> Hi all!!
>>>
>>> After a chance discussion with  a friend on how good MOTU's WDM drivers 
>>> are, I felt I should try 
>>> using my MOTU soundcards WDM drivers, rather than the ASIO ones.  Guess 
>>> what, I have found there 
>>> is 25% les CPU usage when using the WDM drivers, over the ASIO ones.  I 
>>> have also been able to 
>>> significantly drop the buffers in the MOTU control panel too.
>>>
>>> Before, I was using the ASIO drivers and running with buffers in the 
>>> control panel of 256.  My 
>>> CPU usage was around 30% on large projects.  I then moved the buffer down 
>>> to 64 and tested with 
>>> the ASIO drivers.  The CPU usage, jumped to around 76% and some crackling 
>>> was occuring.  So, 
>>> just for fun, I changed from ASIO to WDM, reprofiled the card, and the CPU 
>>> usage, jumped back to 
>>> around 51%.  Note: I have also found that every time you change the buffers 
>>> in your sound cards 
>>> external control panel that it is necessary to reprofile the cards WDM 
>>> driver.  I previously 
>>> hadn't done this and because of the strange audio artifacts that  I was 
>>> hearing, had wrongly 
>>> asumed that I had set the latency too low.  In my case, I new this couldn't 
>>> be right, as I had 
>>> actually moved the buffers in the control panel from 64 to 128 and higher.
>>>
>>> Conclusion, use MOTU's WDM drivers, as they are much better written.
>>>
>>> Regards, Phil Muir
>>> P J Muir Productions
>>> Music And Audio Production
>>> URL:
>>> www.philmuir.com/
>>>
>>> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
>>> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
>>> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>>> ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> ** and in the Subject line type
>>> ** unsubscribe
>>> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
>>> ** immediately-following link:-
>>> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
>>> ** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the 
>>> Subject:- faq
>>>
>>
>> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
>> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
>> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>> ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ** and in the Subject line type
>> ** unsubscribe
>> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
>> ** immediately-following link:-
>> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
>> ** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- 
>> faq
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.7/618 - Release Date: 06/01/2007
>>
>>
>
> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ** and in the Subject line type
> ** unsubscribe
> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> ** immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> ** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- 
> faq
> 


** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to 
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq

Other related posts: