[cryptome] Re: consent and trust? Oh... but we are ABOVE the law
- From: Shaun O'Connor <capricorn8159@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:38:02 +0000
just read that article as well very disturbing indeed.I don't know if
the same tactic is applied in the UK but it would not surpise me in the
least if that was the case.
On 18/12/2014 20:19, Александр wrote:
> https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/12/the_limits_of_p.html
>
>
> - "The next time you call for assistance because the Internet
> service in your home is not working, the 'technician' who comes to
> your door may actually be an undercover government agent. He will
> have secretly disconnected the service, knowing that you will
> naturally call for help and -- when he shows up at your door,
> impersonating a technician -- let him in. He will walk through
> each room of your house, claiming to diagnose the problem.
> Actually, he will be videotaping everything (and everyone) inside.
> He will have no reason to suspect you have broken the law, much
> less probable cause to obtain a search warrant. But that makes no
> difference, because by letting him in, you will have 'consented'
> to an intrusive search of your home"
>
>
> **
--
*_PRIVACY IS A BASIC RIGHT - NOT A CONCESSION _*
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/11/when-time-comes-we-need-be-ready-fight-tpps-secret-anti-user-agenda
Other related posts:
