On 12/6/14, doug <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... > Back to noise and the Tempest, I did notice the other day, that when I > used my new tablet to access my online trading account for the first > time, that I had to confirm its use via my phone. The phone call to me > was automated, and obviously, my voice had been recorded by some kind of > voice pattern recognition software, by the company concerned. My wife > and I were most surprised, because the quality of the phone call was > such that it was almost...I say almost, imperceptible from a real human > being. The reason it was so surprising was because I speak with a very > strong Scottish accent, and me missus says I mumble rather than speak > coherent English, yet the software understood me perfectly. Voice > pattern recognition has come a long way, since those early days... it used to be military, then commercial, now widespread (to the individual). in early 2000's we used voice print authentication for a commercial directory assistance service. "hello, infone" all it needed to give confidence sufficient to authorize for charges. (the margin of error, of course, tune-able to desired tolerances, and indeed, this is where the bulk of complexity lies - too tight, and you can't auth from a pay phone or noisy cell call. too loose, and the number of false positives skyrockets...) > P.S.Did you notice...In the last "Homeland" series, the "secret" > services, whoever they were, used the control of a heart monitor to bump > off one of the "opposition"? Such a "fictional" series must be having > some kind of effect on the masses, don't you think... Cheney's pacemaker had the wireless capabilities removed, specifically because of this risk, which at the time was under-appreciated by the public. (recent medical device hacking research at security conferences has raised the public awareness :) see https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2013/10/22/doctors-disabled-wireless-in-dick-cheneys-pacemaker-to-thwart-hacking/ best regards,