Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:01:53 +0200
Shame, looks like Boy is quiet now.
I wonder who the best player in Africa is.
Might be WarriorBySand. Guy took first in SF, Marvel and KOF at the tourney
in Morocco.
http://shoryuken.com/2013/05/03/road-to-evo-2013-international-africa-fighters-2013-tournament-results-and-footage/
His Gen is pretty sick.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Speaking of weird events...
>
> http://d3dsacqprgcsqh.cloudfront.net/photo/aYb3yw2_700b_v2.jpg
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1366202/Snake-dies-silicone-poisoning-biting-models-breast-photoshoot.html
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Lolz That's only outside bkk. Won't see that many ducks in bkk. Well
>> maybe at restaurant, but the doesn't count. Not sure when did ducks become
>> a tourist attraction...
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> @Di – so they say that seeing the ducks is an important part of a
>>> visit to Thailand. That true?
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.autoevolution.com/news/thousands-of-ducks-cause-funny-traffic-jam-in-thailand-video-82860.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>> *Sent:* 25 June 2014 4:22 PM
>>>
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We could do it that way. That's definitely an option bro :) Nic and GB
>>> can just play their USF4 and UMvC3 matches at the next qualifier. So we'll
>>> proceed as planned.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And thanks :) I'm sure it will :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:17 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Would it be possible for the rest of us to play our games in the
>>> interim? I write in three weeks time so I'd prefer not having a clash but
>>> at the same time I woudn't want to exclude anyone.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On a more serious note, hope everything works out for you dude. Sounds
>>> like you're making the right decision.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> @Everyone who expressed interest in participating in the qualifiers:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Would you be ok with me starting the qualifiers next Saturday and
>>> concluding on Evo weekend to accommodate Nic and GB?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I just knew something like this would happen
>>>
>>> On 25 Jun 2014 12:04, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> :(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> GB is also saying he might not participate due to work stuff :(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Working this Saturday :(
>>>
>>> On 25 Jun 2014 11:29, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks bro. I think so too.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Good luck for the future dude.
>>>
>>> I kinda get the feeling that most any other job will be an improvement.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>> *Sent:* 25 June 2014 11:21 AM
>>>
>>>
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nope, that's still a work in progress.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I do have a potential job lined up but I also have a financial safety
>>> net if worse comes to worst. All things considered, I'll be glad to be free
>>> of this place.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> You managed to find something in the tech writing space?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>> *Sent:* 25 June 2014 11:14 AM
>>>
>>>
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Submitted my resignation today. Happier days ahead, hopefully.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Prometheus would’ve been better if they’d just followed the original
>>> script.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> @Di – have you seen the original trailer for Aliens 3 – the one that has
>>> people fighting the Aliens on Earth? Man, that film went through so many
>>> script changes and director changes. I still like the film.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>> *Sent:* 24 June 2014 8:30 PM
>>>
>>>
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> hopefully we'll get to see more of the universe in prometheus 2.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> They kindda explained more about the space jockey...they did however,
>>> reveal how xeno's started...but still not enough information. In the
>>> comics, they have ranks, different xeno type, hive system, queen's rite of
>>> passage and so much behaviour/intelligence.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The Prometheus series of movies is supposed to explain the origin of
>>> the Xenomorphs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I didn't mind Alien 3 that much. Yes, it's not as good as Alien or
>>> Aliens. But it would be interesting to see Hicks and Newt instead of Ripley
>>> (or Ripley being in a coma).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The Queen Facehugger would be interesting to see. But the whole alien
>>> universe isn't explored much in all the films. All we know in each film is
>>> they are there, and they are ready to fuck things up. Aliens is the only
>>> one that really showed us some information about them. Alien 3 showed us
>>> that it can impregnate other living things...other than that...they're
>>> still a mystery. While in the comics and games, they have more time and
>>> space to explore them more.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I hope they really reboot the series from Alien Resurrection
>>> onwards...while sticking to the whole futuristic army they did in Aliens.
>>> Or even a bridge story about how the Coloney fell apart would be cool too.
>>> Love the series...sadly AVP killed it...AVP 1 wasn't too bad (it's fun to
>>> watch but not to take super seriously like the original series)...AVP2 was
>>> abysmal...fuck the brother straus. they promised us futuristic army at
>>> first, then they thought "what's more scary than aliens in space? aliens in
>>> your backyard..." and the replace everything with CGI. At least AVP 1 they
>>> build the 50 feet Queen :D
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Watched 22 Jump Street last night. I liked how it makes fun of itself
>>> and kinda breaks the fourth wall (lots of quotable material), but then just
>>> like in the first movie it deteriorates into a steaming pile of double dog
>>> shit as it approaches the ending.
>>>
>>> When I got home I watched Alien and Aliens again back to back. This
>>> article on Alien 3 told me a lot about the movie I didn't realize (eg. they
>>> started filming before the script was even complete):
>>> http://www.tor.com/blogs/2012/06/alien-3-a-haunting-failure
>>>
>>> I think I'll watch the Assembly Cut they talk about later tonight.
>>>
>>> Oh, Michael Bay has a new series out:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gZ6bpIjeLs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
