Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:01:01 +0200
I don't think either character has the upper hand. In a 5-5, whoever messes
up first loses. That's generally how these matches went.
If a matchup is 6-4 or worse, it's usually very evident.
Both characters are capable of massive burst damage up close. It really
comes down to who can land the first hit and maintain pressure from there.
I'd say it's a 5-5. Maybe I'm wrong and they made it look like a 5-5 when
it isn't, but it didn't look one-sided to me.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:41 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> rpg's are cool man.
>
> I believe in 2012 it was in favour or oni and now in ultra I think its in
> favour of Dudley.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:31:26 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Looks even.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That was an epic set.
>
> Out if interest, what’s the match-up between Oni and Dud?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 19 June 2014 8:08 AM
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> shadow of mordor looks too epic.
>
> new take on arpg's. nemesis system ftw.
>
>
> Sanford vs mug - went in as enemies came out as frienemies
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:55:09 +0000
>
> Watch the whole thing please
>
> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Date: *Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:31:12 +0000
>
> *To: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject: *RE: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> i watched 10 seconds and i dont get it.
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:01:59 +0000
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-KQW-cSpoc ,,, there I corrected it,, now
> start laughing guys hahahahaha
>
> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Date: *Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:52:48 +0000
>
> *To: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject: *RE: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> broken link is broken
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:47:12 +0000
>
> Anyone that wants to laugh may watch this,, I find it very funny,,
> http://www.youtube.con/watch?v=p-KQW-cSpoc
>
> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Date: *Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:13:19 +0200
>
> *To: *<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> I'd get it *lol*
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Gutlike!
>
>
>
>
> http://nerdburglars.net/341/Article/this-white-ffvii-branded-ps1-will-make-you-want-to-throw-away-your-money.html
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:43 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hmmm,, maybe
>
> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Date: *Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:20:54 +0200
>
> *To: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> Finish him?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Excellent.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Excercised
>
> On 18 Jun 2014 09:07, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ok peeps, it's time to exercise your right to vote yet again :P
>
>
>
> Vote for your preferred scoring format:
> http://www.screator.net/showform.php?f=1193850619
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Yup, been experimenting with that.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You get a really large juggle after the dd+L's 4th hit.
> You can run in jump attack, or qcb+B with a follow up.
>
> On 18 Jun 2014 08:42, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Kewl :) I start the juggle earlier but it gets kinda tricky after that
> and the damage isn't all that great.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yeap.
> Jumping H L, M, H, qcb L cancel, crL, L, M, H, qcb F, cancel, qcb M, crL,
> M, H, dd L, and then some options I'm still gonna check out to see if I can
> make enough meter for a super. Pretty close with 2 options.
>
> Does it involve the launch stuff? :P I'm trying to find something cool but
> practical. It would also help if it was damaging *lol*
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Lol.
> I'm going for variation.
> Too much playing with Mature I suppose.
> I'm going for something waaaay more complicated, lol.
>
> On 17 Jun 2014 21:52, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I assume that's the GHA version.
>
>
>
> The combo I'm doing is:
>
>
>
> j.H, cr.Lx2, s.M, s.H xx qcb+L~cancel(I end up behind the opponent, then
> cancel)~repeat same combo~cancel, cr.Lx2, s.M, s.H xx d,d+L xx HHA. That
> should net you 558.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> My first attempt with a 3 bar Ikuro gets me 551 damage.
>
> On 17 Jun 2014 21:43, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> *lol* 558 now :P I'll take it!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> *lol* Oh well, managed to squeeze some extra damage out of the combo so
> it's all good. I had a cool juggle variant in mind but it's kinda iffy.
> I'll stick to the grounded version for now. The juggle stuff looks really
> cool though :P
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Erm, scratch that, Ikuro gets health.
> Lol.
>
> On 17 Jun 2014 21:35, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> True.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You'll get lots more when you hit rage mode.
>
>
> On 17 Jun 2014 21:32, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Interesting :P
> >
> > Seems my 'decent' combo with Ikuro requires 3 bars, not 2 :( I get 524
> though so it's worth it. Also looks cool.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
