He hasn't bought his yet*. I don't doubt that their marketing is
misleading, but I also don't doubt that he's mistaken about his
experience. He probably has just never tried any other similar glasses
either.
Gunnar has in the past responded to claims about marketing hype:
http://betanews.com/2011/02/20/the-hype-vs-the-science-of-digital-eyewear/
*I asked him if he's really OK with walking around with these shitty
looking shades and he said he won't buy the shades, but he'll get a
prescription pair in a frame that he likes.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Ah, then it's faith healing.
I have an issue with their advertising.
I asked them about their claims as well. That was ignored. Loudly.
It's a yellow filter with an anti-reflective coating. And I doubt
strongly that it blocks as much high energy blue light as mine. Could you
borrow his pair?
I'd like to run some tests.
Their entire site is full of BS
"recommended by Doctors", riiight. Give me their names.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nah, he's the last person to listen to marketing. He told me this
because his colleague lent him a pair for a few days because he was so
skeptical about them.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Your brother's eyes have been listening to too much marketing.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Speaking of burning your eyes out, my brother said these actually make
a big difference:
http://www.gunnars.com/
@Rich, this is one of the reasons I bought a PVM in the first place...
