People generally do a lot better against the shell now than during the
'Chris G's rent money' days, but that's because they've had a lot of time
to learn how to fight it effectively (look at Flux, for example). It's
still a damn strong shell and its end-game status isn't going anywhere, but
people tend to fight it more comfortably these days. That said, l agree
that MorriDoom should completely dominate MorriChun.
On the subject of Ryan LV as a phenomenal player, if you can hold your own
against ZMC with point Chun and no dominant neutral assist (TK Shot is
strong but it's nowhere near the level of missiles, jam session, plasma
beam, etc), l'd say you're pretty damn good. He makes it look effortless,
which is a testament to his skill as a player.
On 13 Mar 2017 11:36, "Sameegh Jardine" <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Agree with this.
Technically Virgil beats Phoenix and MorriDoom should beat MorriChun. Ryan
winning is more a function of his current ability and dedication rather
than having a hard counter to Chris' team. Also players just need some more
time to get to grips with how to deal with the shell for now. It's not
really something that many players have come up against.
On 13 Mar 2017, at 9:46 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's not that Morridoom isn't good anymore. Ryan LV is just an amazing
Marvel player. He really shouldn't do that well with point Chun but he
makes it work. You can tell he spent a lot of time refining that character.
Not to mention, all of his characters are a threat. He has a very good
chance of winning Evo this year. The only player l've seen him legitimately
struggle against was FChamp, and that's only because of Dormammu.
On 13 Mar 2017 08:18, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
mahvel is hype tho
fkn chris g got countered the f out.
chunli is viable. morridoom isn't that great anymore. Mahvel is evoliving
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 13 March 2017 06:10 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
OMG, I missed the SF5 on FR last night?
Nooo! How could this happen? **SOBS**
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 13 March 2017 08:09
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
man sfv is hype af
who won FR. ehubs is blocked at work
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 13 March 2017 04:55 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Free-to-play tactics-like card game (like Hearthstone) that's getting
pretty good reviews:
http://store.steampowered.com/app/397060/
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__store.steampowered.com_app_397060_&d=DwMFAw&c=0TzQCy9lgR5hSW-bDg5HA76y7nf4lvOzvVop5GM3Y80&r=3188cCLKqrRVUgvzUimFxNxHH_Hcs83no5DXOBKTq-g&m=hSxMERnO_hTW3bNX76CTGhedTvt_EIIvYDoB4NoidYg&s=2sQIY5IRZxo5gR4JKNfHQQJVJRYw_PgRypabG89Ls4g&e=>
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
No, it's a Marvel character who has multiple personality disorder, and his
personality's have super powers.
You won't like it Rich
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:42 PM, richard moorcroft <
greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What is legion? Is it like game of Thrones??
On 10 Mar 2017 9:54 AM, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah I'm not gonna bother.
I just get annoyed.
On Friday, 10 March 2017, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I watched it now. It's still intreaguing, but it has less clout.
It feels low budget
On 9 Mar 2017 23:34, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you were wondering about Legion, the last episode was different, but the
style is the still the same.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
