[CTS] Re: Unable to upgrade to XP
- From: Hal Brown <hdb@xxxxxxx>
- To: computertalkshop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 21:00:07 -0500
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 01:51:26PM -0800, Charles R. Buchanan duly noted:
>
>While I'm not `totally' disagreeing with you, because XP does have a robust
>driver set, but W2k has been very stable. At least for me. :-) Plus whassup
>wit dis activation stuff? <g> :-)
--------end quoted text----------
Win2K is stable for me, if I get the right hardware combo. I've had trouble
with it on several machines where it just would not run.
As far as activation, as I said it sucks, and I despise it. But, if you
want to use XP that's the way it is...for now. You're free to use whatever
you want, even Linux, so I really don't see a problem. If you've had
problems with XP or don't like it, or the activation is too deplorable, then
simply use something else. That's why God allowed Imacs. ;-)
For now I haven't seen anything to compare to XP. But there's always hope.
--
Expert: A person who knows more and more about less and less.
Hal Brown
mailto: hdb@xxxxxxx
Visit me at: http://adwt.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Computer Talk Shop http://www.computertalkshop.com
Un-subscribe/Vacation, http://questforcertification.com/cts/list_options.htm
List HowTo: http://questforcertification.com/cts/faq
To join Computer Talk Shop's off topic list, please goto:
http://questforcertification.com/cts/other_cts_lists.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Other related posts:
