Joe,
It wouldn't work. For instance, you take a single picture of what looks like a person 'throwing a butt away'. On the basis of that single picture, could you convict ? No. The person simply says that they went over and picked up the butt after 'accidently' discarding it. You would need a movie of them throwing away the butt and then leaving the area. And, you would need confirmation that the butt that you found was the same butt shown in the film. And, you are going to sit in the hot sun all day, looking for a person to throw away a cig ? I doubt it.
And, Joe, your thought processes are no more warped than most of the rest of us. ;-)
From: Cuffy10@xxxxxxx
I have a warped thought process but when I look at this a question comes to
mind.
Wouldn't it be easier, simpler, faster to inforce the Anti-Litter laws than
to legislate a smoking ban ?
A person with a camera and a long lens could make a fortune with a $500 fine
for littering and that would solve all the littering problem, not just the
cigarette butt part of it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Computer Talk Shop http://www.computertalkshop.com Un-subscribe/Vacation, http://www.computertalkshop.com/list_options.htm
To join Computer Talk Shop's off topic list, please goto: http://computertalkshop.com/other_cts_lists.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
