On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:37:04 -0700, Rick Sands wrote: > Wow... Sounds like you had a *great* meeting. Personally, I'd rather have > the informal discussions like that MOST of the time with formal > presentations deriving from them only as needed. I like the idea. Always have, which was why we started out meeting at a brew pub! Let's just make it a point not to pack a whole meeting with formal presentations--maybe go 45 minutes or 60 max--and leave the rest of the time for open discussion. If we don't have a presentation from time to time, that seems to be cool too, but it's nice if we can advertise that there is at least going to be a topic for discussion since that helps when I try to advertise the meeting. We don't have to say "now everyone must talk about X" but let's at least say that someone will be prepared to start a conversation about X if other topics don't take over on their own. Many meetings of this sort allow for some time for just "networking" and I think that'd be good for us, too. David > > -Rick > > > -----Original Message----- > From: comodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:comodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of David Beers > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 1:26 PM > To: Rick Sands > Subject: [CoMoDev] Re: Welcome to David Wathen > > No sweat, Rick. It apparently turned out to be a bad night for most of the > regulars--I might not have made it myself if it hadn't been for the fact > that I was responsible for presenting. > > As it happened the three of us who made it dispensed with the formal > presentation and just had a rollicking good discussion on topics such as: > * The relative merits of Java and .NET (discussed among guys who use > both and don't have a 'religious' affiliation to either) > * The future of the Win32 API > * How the Palm/WinMobile/Symbian showdown will shake out in the > coming years > * The joys and perils of independent consulting > * The somewhat counterintuitive evolution of the mobile software > market from a zillion different classes of applications to just a few and > what that means > * The strong demand for ruggedized devices (and how this has been a > boon to the Windows Mobile platform) > * Why dirt bikes are good and ATVs are evil > > I'd like to say you didn't miss much, but I'd be lying if I did. All > present agreed that we had *very* important things to say. ;-) > > We'll do SyncML another time. Maybe April if there isn't a demand for > something else. Paul Herin made noises about doing a presentation on how to > do crypto when you don't know if your mobile is going to be talking to a > .NET server, a J2EE server, or your aunt Lucille's toaster oven, so I'm > inclined to lean on him for that! :-) > > David > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:23:46 -0700, Rick Sands wrote: >> First, welcome to David Wathen ... >> >> Second, I am sorry I missed last night's meeting - especially after >> saying I'd be there... Stuff came up (Girl Scouts) and I was hi-jacked > into it... >> >> -Rick >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: comodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:comodev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Beers >> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 10:56 AM >> To: comodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [CoMoDev] Welcome to David Wathen >> >> Folks, please welcome David Wathen to the CoMoDev list. David is a >> software developer in a Boulder-based startup called LockSolid. He's >> interested in learning more about mobile development issues in >> preparation for some development his company is planning on doing in the > future. >> >> Welcome aboard, David! >> >> ========================= >> David Beers, Moderator >> Colorado Mobile Developers >> www.comodev.com