-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 6/30/2014 8:14 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > Should we fix code in these blocks or strip them form the code > base? I find them informative. We could rip them at the first major rewrite, where I hope we can replace the E4M code. Bill -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTsjPiAAoJEL9an3rWhBk+CSAQAIDfLh+M/c1oscYwYTNcJ4eZ P8IJs2ysXY3sd3TlPU9CYAzC1jO3EAl/GMh7MzKGckXtyCLRVge5Du4dLtCxSv7/ 9285/SlWNkXH42zfmIsz5H5hIIpVInURXsOKgo2JaPuu2LvK4oE02VaBUlpxTx+w sWU6YlBHC9WGeNsHPQZTU+asBqbuCIMIFs1ixxJ1mctY1MQP+adfnvEL/UOV1yA3 r6J7Kq5CzET+8/QotNIcOyMf22vJdlyv1itz5WcgPAmvbpV7CaF+i2o0mlrHTbZ0 oiv4yNl5FwOoIXP1QiApeDa8cyOK6B0qqMvcvSmmiwbGfuXx7KVrAbhkSObf+LjL l7iQPqPZ3/TmHf7vLgPsWmU17ENaBwxrSdSoRhhJzuJKqVfQ4TO28Pg2YVCYVewW NSmbZZ18otw3x4LPLcweRDbjCi+ZrGYp9g+pseMv1sPW9LbtYyXjv4WKr/1m5TYn Ih5Un4Bu7wsjntAfXzw1jScGc2pSP38Vv9zKvJjJRr4LhAO6TJhlOvY4FxP6Lvip sRf6wOCVzTPLRmz57A7Jb91LeCikRfJ+G9ti+3LIGNfCqRS1A0t5XOE1xWBOs+IJ UG4TQLXbN29Va+JjCu2IDZD2E0Hv/hZhKXwQc0HXKXZWlM5mamu4eGWU/M4hIpRL pbJFKi7MiuRP2azvtAm8 =pY0X -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----