[ciphershed] Re: Reviewed commit e8529e95d89d3f519a31ef7de5bd7f0d0d318e8c
- From: "Alain Forget" <aforget@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 19:11:54 -0400
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ciphershed-
>bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dimitri Schoolwerth
>Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 19:04
>To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ciphershed] Re: Reviewed commit
>e8529e95d89d3f519a31ef7de5bd7f0d0d318e8c
>
>
>
>On 7/2/14, 2:02, Alain Forget wrote:
>> I have no idea what I'm doing. However, this is a good way to make you guys
>test to see if my e-mail signing actually works. :-P
>
>My client didn't pick it up at least (no error shown) and you took 2
>turns, suspicious! ;).
I thought we were supposed to take two turns! :-s This is why I said I have no
idea what I'm doing. :-P
Alain
> I see now it also didn't pick up Jason's ("Error
>- No valid armored OpenPGP data block found") so could be something on
>my end.
>> 0: E8529E95D89D3F519A31EF7DE5BD7F0D0D318E8C
>> 1: E8529E95D89D3519A31EF7DE5BD7F0D0D318E8C
>> 2: E8529E95D89D3519A31F7DE5BD7F0D0D318E8C
>> 3: E852E95D89D3519A31F7DE5BD7F0D0D318E8C
>> 4: E852E95D89D3519A31F7DE5BD7F0D0D18E8C
>
>5: E852E95D8D3519A31F7DE5BD7F0D0D18E8C
>G: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
>
>Regards,
>Dimitri
Other related posts:
