[ciphershed] Re: Post to truecrypt.ch about securing Ciphershed
- From: Pid Zero <p1dz3r0@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 07:19:52 +0100
*Adjusts tinfoil hat*
Some valid concerns (& answers), I'm curious who you think the mole is.
We'll never eliminate risk entirely but we can make it unrealisticlly
difficult for a TLA to do any real damage.
On Friday, July 4, 2014, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I had so much fun writing the post, I thought maybe you would enjoy
> reading it:
>
> https://forum.truecrypt.ch/t/safeguards-against-nsa-infiltration/185/5
>
> Bill
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTtiN8AAoJEL9an3rWhBk+IfgQAKUzvkkZDQmV+WYZce4s1mCO
> vDKfJPqcXrC6yOtzSp4ubcjPPjPuEY4PXr9hHMpe4FVB5gMkIY5e+PLqWwh5r1eu
> KJ2GxGb7Btr0+WxnOmJ53XBxG1kv9osizMvBAZ8zG62uX/S+JE3GR0CZ338SoYyz
> BEiaG0oX7r6oSNBfmf4w5SQN9tMLDSfcZh7GjN8F+YOseNfI/Kwoq9vQeDOQF2z2
> 70z9WIE0BhQXe4DoOlBKmS16IAfaWJb1briG3l/zF7UeeUUmxlUbDdmpYlUcx479
> bwcVgkMPuFRpVXem8F3fMpXGB9M1f7WSP29mc1AOQGNYFagvTVKRNpfWFX4+fQDF
> VMZUDW8jhK09MF//xabNr4pjJ3tsZDVbx961ghql2umxF8RRAs+CgRVhDg8vHaQt
> 2WgrRxZNbO1fNXXF+Pknr1TRSpySo9PtP7KhiolE7eOhKBgPL29Jy4j9sCYD7oBv
> rTaUEqjvOEFGcItNxR5DN6mRl8/311RIFbK8KJspXb8QsstI7Y4/olkQFfdCyM3h
> I9qCuX31o2tBuaPxDXPbKhJP2Ep3jYUP40/JVIZHt3mlBIumjZdIV5KFtR3bXNJM
> Zy6nygSGupdEz6QcVLTiR0FITB21Ylj211Um5NWgi8K1783Ebll9GsC2/v9b9Z/0
> ttxO0bVzV6tHWYbgGLlS
> =3T0D
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
--
At the time of writing, no warrants have ever been served to me, nor am I
under any personal legal compulsion concerning the
CipherShed project. I do not know of any searches or seizures of my
assets.
Other related posts:
