On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 13:10:44 +0400 Dimitri Schoolwerth <dimitri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > Are minutes of the PMC meeting available yet? Sorry it's taking so long. I'm writing a blog post about it just now. It's basically all reviewed, just a little ugly in formatting. ;) > > > Regards, > Dimitri > > > On 6/28/14, 13:58, Niklas Lemcke - 林樂寬 wrote: > > > I'm sending the list of items to discuss in the meeting here again for > > everybody's review. > > > > List in chronological order! > > > > ## precedure related topics ## > > * have Jos explain the nature of his foundation, and the intended nature > > of collaboration with the CipherShed Project > > * record voice meetings & post them online (I'm not that comfortable with > > that) > > * simultaneous IRC chat > > * method of voting > > * appoint QA Team members > > * define a protocol to be followed for merges to the codebase (PMC vs. QA > > Team) > > * decide how to accept new contributors > > * warrant canary solution > > * Voice chats vs. IRC / mailing list discussions > > * contact address (listaddress vs. @ciphershed.org) > > * hopefully give Jos the go-ahead for funneling all them people towards > > the CipherShed Project, and simultaneously discuss whether he should > > officially question the security of Protectorion on twitter > > > > > > ## code progress related topics ## > > * signing / tagging of commits (related to merge-protocol) > > * who does binary creation signing? Multiple persons for comparison? > > * estimate date for first rebranded release, as well as what is supposed > > to be included > > * decide what should be included in second 'bugfix-release', and try to > > estimate a timeframe / workload > > > > (message didn't immediately arrive on PMC list, so I repost here.) > > -- Niklas - 林樂寬
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
