For people who want to know how it is made: the (still) picture represents a spectpgram, with the horizontal axis as time and the vertical axis as frequency; the color determines the amplitude of the given frequency band. So the image is actually read from left to right. I think this isn't the best method for making sound of a strange attractor, since the dynamic systems (not IFS, but the other types) create various points at given time-intervals, so you could map those values (coordinates of the points) into a wave-file. I once tied that, and it pretty much sounded like noise (but that's the chaos of strange attractors!!!)... sometimes with some resonant frequencies in it... And is IFS a strange attractor? On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Leo Feret <leoferet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The sound is better than most fractal music I've heard, but the visual > aspect is weak. > > Leo Feret - "I'm not always at the keyboard; > ·|Ô¿Ô¬|· ̣˙̣˙ ̣˙̣˙̣˙ ̣˙̣˙sometimes I use the mouse." > "Change before you have to." - Jack Welch > "Change is the only constant." - Arthur Schopenhauer > > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:08, Terry King <cricket333@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Ever wonder what a Chaoscope strange attractor sounds like? >> http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=wz_W6APdkf4 is a youtube posting of a IFS >> attractor converted to music??? via AudioPaint software. I'm interested in >> your response. Terry King >> > >