I'm going to concur with the previous votes - 100kb is a great size, as it won't fill up my monthly bandwidth ('restrictions') too fast :) I must admit that I *was* leaning towards 'Unlimited or more'... (only because I wanted to see 'or more' ;) ) ~James On Wed, 26 May 2004 02:22:06 +0100, "Chaoscope" <chaoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > Hi, > > What should be the maximum attachment size allowed on this mailing-list? > > Should it be : > > a) I don't want to receive any attachment thank you very much > b) 30Kb > c) 100Kb > d) 500Kb > e) Unlimited or more > > It would be great if we could get ten votes at least. > > Cheers! > > Nicolas Desprez > ====================================================== > The Chaoscope mailing-list > Archives : //www.freelists.org/archives/chaoscope > Admin contact : chaoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Web site : http://www.chaoscope.org > ====================================================== -- James Skemp jamesrskemp@xxxxxx http://jamesrskemp.net/ http://www.orkut.com/Profile.aspx?uid=2042828723132845863 (Thanks Gavin) ====================================================== The Chaoscope mailing-list Archives : //www.freelists.org/archives/chaoscope Admin contact : chaoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Web site : http://www.chaoscope.org ======================================================