>At one stage, the release of the Win3 source was one of the carrots >which MS was offering in last year's dispute with the Department of >Justice. I haven't heard any more, so it looks as though that >particular avenue is dead. I'm not so sure I'd want source. Yes, it'd >be nice to have and maybe we could see that some stuff was inspired or >we could point and laugh. > >But the _actual_ _full_ specification would be useful, source or not. >The WORST part of my job is "make X work like Y" specifications. >I'd rather have a real spec. -- it can be stupid, but at least not >"make X like Y" becasue inevitably the customer wants some feature >of Y in the new X that you (I) have managed to never even see. That'd be cool...a new breed of Calmira. CalWin, a replacement for Windows 3.1. ;) There's always decompilers! Hehehe. I tried a decompiler on a VB app of mine once...didn't work. :-\ High quality! Ross _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com To unsubscribe, send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe calmira_tips" in the body. OR visit http://freelists.dhs.org