[bookshare-discuss] Re: papers
- From: "Brian Miller" <brian-r-miller@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:55:02 -0800
I think more to the point, it would be good to know by what method or set of
criteria are papers added to teh beta links on the Bookshare site.
It seems a peculiar mix of papers -- from the sublime to the absurd,
frankly.
Brian Miller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Roderick" <richard@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 7:19 AM
Subject: [bookshare-discuss] papers
> I have a couple of thoughts concerning papers. I agree about Illinois
> papers. I would like to see some on the Bookshare site. The Chicago
> Tribune is on Newsline but not on Bookshare. Since they are getting feeds
> from the papers themselves, I wonder if this is a copyright issue.
>
> Second, a big deficiency of Newsline is that it provides no Central
> Illinois papers. Examples include the Peoria Journal-Star, the
> Bloomington-Normal Daily Pantagraph, the Champaign-Urbana News Gazzette,
> and the Decatur and Springfield papers.
>
> I also think it would be helpfull if the site, and Newsline for that
> matter, would have a some kind of notation as to whethetr or not a paper
> is complete or not. Perhaps, the word "complete" could be used in front
> of the papers that provide pretty much all content and the word "excertps"
> in fron of those that don't.
>
> Rick Roderick,
> Louisville, KY
> richard@xxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
