[bookshare-discuss] Re: Fwd: info on google books, from jay m silverman

  • From: "D Hubbard" <dhubb100@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 06:10:10 -0400

Interesting read.  Barns and Nobel have an EReader now as well.  You have to 
pay for the books but at least they're accessible.  I'm for anything that makes 
knowledge more accessible to us so we too can be empowered.  Why not?

Thanks.

-Diane
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx 
  To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 8:53 PM
  Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Fwd: info on google books, from jay m silverman



  Advocates: Google Books can bridge digital divide

  Much of the discussion around Google's proposed book settlement has centered 
on copyright law and competition. Advocates for access got their say Thursday.

  A coalition of civil-rights and disability groups in favor of Google's 
book-scanning project held a press conference Thursday to marshal support for 
improving
  access to knowledge, the key benefit of 
  Google's deal with authors and publishers to create a new kind of digital 
library
  . They fear that a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to gain digital access to 
knowledge previously stored in libraries at expensive universities or rich 
communities
  could be hampered by the 
  opposition to the settlement from some authors and privacy advocates.

  Companies and organizations are rapidly lining up
  on either side of the proposed settlement, reached last October, after Google 
was sued in 2005 for scanning out-of-print works without explicit permission
  from rights holders. The deadline to submit comments has been extended to 
next Tuesday as the result of the last-minute realization that the U.S. District
  Court for the Southern District of New York had planned to take its servers 
down for maintenance over the holiday weekend, though the 
  deadline for authors to opt out
  of the settlement remains Friday.

  Those opposing the settlement have perhaps protested most loudly over the 
past six months, but Google put together a group of organizations who stand to
  make huge gains, if the settlement is approved--and not the monetary kind--to 
make their case on Thursday.

  Blind people, for example, have access to 
  a special library run by the Library of Congress
  that converts print books into formats readable by the visually impaired, but 
that library--in existence since 1931--only has 70,000 texts, said Chris
  Danielsen, director of public relations for the National Federation of the 
Blind. If the settlement is approved in October, it will give "print-disabled"
  people "access to more books than we have ever had in human history," he said.

  Advocates for the blind 
  found themselves on the opposite side
  of the Author's Guild, one of the parties to the Google settlement, earlier 
this year, after the guild protested that the text-to-speech reader on Amazon's
  Kindle could hurt the market for audiobooks, prompting Amazon to give control 
of the feature to authors.

  Settlement supporters like Lateef Mtima, a professor at Howard University, 
compared the possibility of opening up access to the books to his experiences
  growing up in Harlem in the 1960s, then transferring to 
  Stuyvesant High School
  , a specialized school for gifted science and math students. His fellow 
students at Stuyvesant had already been exposed to a great deal of the 
literature
  covered in English classes at the school, making Mtima realize that he had to 
catch up to be competitive.

  Providing digital access to literature and textbooks would allow libraries at 
all schools to simply maintain PCs, rather than having to devote resources
  toward acquiring and maintaining books, several supporters argued. Many 
communities in poorer parts of the country don't have the resources to maintain
  libraries competitive with those in richer communities, and lack of access to 
knowledge makes it harder for students in those communities to learn, according
  to Wade Henderson of the 
  Leadership Council on Civil Rights.

  Whether or not Judge Denny Chin is swayed by these arguments remains to be 
seen, since opponents who believe Google overstepped its bounds by scanning 
copyright-protected
  books will likely make the case that two wrongs don't make a right. Still, 
they underscore exactly what is at stake with Google's library project: a chance
  to transform the way the world accesses knowledge with an extremely difficult 
undertaking that few companies or organizations outside of governments are
  thought capable of matching at the present time.

  The VR Stream list is configured so that when using Control-R in most e-mail 
programs, message replies will go directly to the sender of the message. To
  reply to the entire list, use the "reply all" function of your e-mail 
program; usually Control-Shift-R._______________________________________________
  Vrstream mailing list
  Vrstream@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  http://vrstreamusers.org/mailman/listinfo/vrstream_vrstreamusers.org


                                                                   "The end may 
justify the means as long as there is something that justifies the end. 
  " Leon Trotsky     

               The Militant: http://www.themilitant.com Pathfinder Press: 
http://www.pathfinderpress.com
  Granma International: http://granma.cu/ingles/index.html
               _ 

Other related posts: